<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Evaluation on Antonio Cortés (DrZippie)</title><link>https://antoniocortes.com/tags/evaluation/</link><description>Recent content in Evaluation on Antonio Cortés (DrZippie)</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>es-es</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 21:57:18 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://antoniocortes.com/tags/evaluation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>European Open Source AI Index: Measuring True AI Openness</title><link>https://antoniocortes.com/en/european-open-source-ai-index/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://antoniocortes.com/en/european-open-source-ai-index/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Lately I&amp;rsquo;m seeing more and more AI models calling themselves &amp;ldquo;open source&amp;rdquo;. Llama, Mistral, Falcon&amp;hellip; they all claim to be &amp;ldquo;open&amp;rdquo;. But are they really? How open are they actually?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I recently discovered the &lt;strong&gt;European Open Source AI Index (OSAI)&lt;/strong&gt;, a European initiative doing excellent work systematically evaluating how open generative AI models really are.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>