<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Regulation on Antonio Cortés (DrZippie)</title><link>https://antoniocortes.com/en/tags/regulation/</link><description>Recent content in Regulation on Antonio Cortés (DrZippie)</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:35:56 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://antoniocortes.com/en/tags/regulation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Age Nobody Checks: AI, Minors and a Checkbox That Protects No One</title><link>https://antoniocortes.com/en/ia-menores-verificacion-edad/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://antoniocortes.com/en/ia-menores-verificacion-edad/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Common Sense Media published its &lt;a href="https://institute.commonsensemedia.org/risk-assessments/perplexity"&gt;Perplexity risk assessment&lt;/a&gt; today, and the verdict is the harshest on their scale: &lt;strong&gt;unacceptable risk&lt;/strong&gt;. High or unacceptable across all eight principles they evaluate, and a failure on four of the five severe-harm &amp;ldquo;Red Lines&amp;rdquo; they tested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I could write this article about Perplexity. It would be easy, because the &lt;a href="https://institute.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/risk-assessments/csm-ai-risk-assessment-perplexity-09152026_0.pdf"&gt;full report&lt;/a&gt; gives you plenty of ammunition: 1,200 searches, an audit of over 1,000 citations, some uncomfortable screenshots. But I think that would be the wrong article.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>