<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cpp on Antonio Cortés (DrZippie)</title><link>https://antoniocortes.com/en/tags/cpp/</link><description>Recent content in Cpp on Antonio Cortés (DrZippie)</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 10:03:08 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://antoniocortes.com/en/tags/cpp/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>C++26 fails its ISO ballot, and contracts are the reason</title><link>https://antoniocortes.com/en/cpp26-votacion-iso/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://antoniocortes.com/en/cpp26-votacion-iso/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Something has happened that, as far as anyone can tell, had never happened before: the &lt;strong&gt;C++26 draft has been rejected&lt;/strong&gt; in its ISO DIS ballot, the step before the standard is published. Robert Seacord, convenor of the C committee, announced it tersely on LinkedIn on 24 October: &amp;ldquo;Balloting has completed for C++26. Unfortunately it was Disapproved&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mateusz Pusz, author of the mp-units library and a member of the Polish national committee, explains it in detail in &lt;a href="https://train-it.eu/blog/cpp26-contracts-the-ballot-result/"&gt;The result of the C++26 DIS ballot&lt;/a&gt;, the sixth post in a series on the dispute behind it. Seacord doesn&amp;rsquo;t think any language standard from ISO&amp;rsquo;s SC22 subcommittee has ever failed this ballot, and Daveed Vandevoorde, from the C++ committee&amp;rsquo;s direction group, wrote that no earlier C++ draft had received even a single vote against.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>